Here's what I ended up with (with real stuff in the classes...)
site.pp:
stage { [ "pre", "post" ]: }
Stage['pre'] -> Stage['main'] -> Stage['post']
class first {
...
}
class second {
...
}
class third {
...
}
node default {
class { 'first': stage => pre }
class { 'second': stage => main }
class { 'third': stage => post }
}
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Nigel Kersten <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:29 AM, David Kavanagh <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I understand how before, requires, etc work. I'm not quite so clear on
> > stages.
> > I have many modules I've created for various configuration items. My
> site.pp
> > contains a class that simply includes them (some, based on facts). I have
> a
> > default node that includes the class. That's fine. However, I want to
> ensure
> > there is some order. I realize if I did this in the classes, I would be
> > letting some modules know about other modules. To me, that breaks the
> > encapsulation I've gained with the modules (to some extent).
>
> Have you seen the newer relationship syntax? You can define
> relationships outside of the objects themselves, so you could do this
> in site.pp
>
> Class["a"] -> Class["b"] -> Class["c"]
>
> etc
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
