On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:06:51PM -0700, James Turnbull wrote:
> Nigel Kersten wrote:
>> The file{} type can do all of the following:
>> * manage symlinks>> How would people feel about at least splitting out these into their own >> types? >> >> * symlinks > On a final note ... can we not overload "ensure" in our new types? :) I'm a +1 on splitting out symlinks. It's been one of the biggest catches for people when I've been teaching them puppet. Once that's split out removing the overloading of ensure for the file type and replacing it with some stricter validation would be excellent. Dean -- Dean Wilson http://www.unixdaemon.net @unixdaemon http://www.puppetcookbook.com @puppetcookbook -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
