you could also define the key as virtual resource and realize it on
different occasions (hosts).


2011/5/10 Felix Frank <[email protected]>

> On 05/10/2011 12:38 PM, Arnau Bria wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 May 2011 12:26:06 +0200
> > Felix Frank wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> > Hi Felix,
> >
> >>> Am I trying to do something not supported?
> >>
> >> Yes.
> > Do you know if this is going to be supportted in future?
>
> Redeclaration of the same resource is not going to work ;-)
>
> As for the distribution of one authorized_key to multiple user
> accounts...I'm not sure that it's as useful as it sounds, given the
> trivial workaround.
>
> If you're keen to get it anyway, you may want to open a ticket.
>
> Regards,
> Felix
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to