Hi, On 06/07/2012 06:13 AM, Ryan Bowlby wrote: > What would be the downside of creating a module called common-packages > which would become the central location for simple packages (no > daemon/service, etc)? Declare all the packages within the > common-packages class as virtual resources. Then each module can feed > off that class for the individual packages it requires. This would solve > the problem caused by multiple identical package resources being defined > throughout modules.
I believe that for modules that are meant for use on your site only (i.e. not for publishing on the forge etc.), this approach is perfectly fine. Cheers, Felix -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
