Thanks your answers.
I don't figure out how avoid execute because i have a massive input
account by ENC json setting all users and membership of each one of
them. I had to make uniq entries array to avoid Duplicate definition
error condition because many users could (in fact are) belong to a
same group.
May be i miss something but i think that i can benefit from working
with defined resource types
(vs classes) so the same nesting call is setting dependencies
implicitly.
For example a big picture of nesting call in my recipe is something
like :
class updssh( $users ) -> Parameter class having json as input.
└── user_keys { $arrays_users: } Call it foreach user.
├── updssh::check_groups { $usr_groups: } Call it for ensure
membership of user
└── updssh::load_ssh_key{ $user_ssh : Call it to set account
(create/update)
So I don't see dependencies like any problem because the nesting call
is doing by self.
Testing are tell me that nevertheless , i'm wondering , Am i wrong ?
Even knowing it's the first version i have to confess that i'm happy
with it because not only resolve dependencies by self but also it
create groups that don't exist. Also i enjoy using functions like
'defined' which it's great to check current status.
Regards,
eduardo.
On 3 jul, 13:57, Nan Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Tim Mooney <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In regard to: [Puppet Users] Re: groups dependencies at user creation,...:
>
> >> Thanks tim for answer me, The fact is $groups is an array, so when i
> >> try something like this
>
> >> ------
> >> Group[$groups] -> User[$username]
>
> >> user { $username:
> >> comment => "$email",
> >> home => "/home/$username",
> >> shell => "/bin/bash",
> >> password => "!!",
> >> groups => $groups
> >> }
>
> >> ------
>
> >> I'd got :
>
> >> err: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 400 on
> >> SERVER: Could not find resource 'Group[sudo]Group[admin]Group[deploy]'
> >> for relationship on 'User[ppuser7]' on node casa
>
> > I was afraid that might be the case, but thought it was worth a try.
>
> > Does this work better:
>
> > $groups_as_array = split($groups, ',')
> > Groups[$groups_as_array] -> User[$username]
>
> AFAIK, the short hand syntax doesn't support array values, and you
> need something like a define resource type to wrap this.
>
> define group_dep($username) {
> Groups[$name] -> User[$username]
>
> }
>
> group_dep { $group_as_array :
> username => $username,
>
> }
>
> Nan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
