On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Eric Sorenson <[email protected]> wrote:
> There is an open question about whether it's safe to append a suffix of > '.service' to the service name for systemd -- Can someone with deep > knowledge of systemd please chime in on the ticket? Don't have an account there. But something ending in .service is but one example of a systemd unit. All have similar properties (in that they can be started, stopped, have status, etc). For the service type in puppet, it would be 99.9% safe to just append .service in the systemd provider and be done with it. But perhaps people would want to manage other types of units with puppet - for which a new type could be written, but given that they share so much with "services", it makes sense to just overload that, IMO - so I guess the answer is that there's pros and cons to both approaches :) $0.02 -Jon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
