On Friday, December 7, 2012 2:56:30 PM UTC-5, ohad wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Ugo Bellavance <[email protected]<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> I realize that maybe these modules have been built to be used only with >> foreman. Is that a decent assumption? And if so, is there a simple apache >> module somewhere? I only want to do the basics, check packages, service, >> and create vhosts. I may be better writing my own... >> >> > Ideally we would like to share & reuse the modules as much as possible, > they are not aimed to work just for the installer ( a lot of people use > them for a lot of different usage cases). > > specifically, you tried to override a class that has no param class > attached to it. > > Hmmm, I kind of understand the concept, but wouldn't know how to fix the module as of now.
> saying that, we are going a process of parameteriziing all of our > classes, so if you would like to send a patch / pull request we would > gladly accept. > > Ok, I'll do my best. One of our devs spent a few hours today to puppet-lint the module, generate the doc and make it standard compliant. I currently get errors on the metadata.json files, but when I get something stable I'll send it to you (I'm not familiar with git, pull requests or even patches). Thanks, Ugo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/ikxg2vahDBoJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
