On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Mohamed Abbas <[email protected]>wrote:

>  On 3/7/13 1:51 PM, Nan Liu wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Mohamed Abbas <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I'm wondering what is the canonical way of associating "specific"
>> versions of a module to a node? Is there a way of doing this in puppet? Let
>> me explain a "Use Case" of what I'm trying to accomplish:
>>
>> Say we have created a puppet model called apache to manage and configure
>> apache webserver.
>> We have the apache module under version control and there are several
>> versions.
>> We use puppet to apply apache-1.0.3 across an entire "environment"
>> We want to be able to do a rolling upgrade across that entire
>> environment, where some nodes in the environment have apache-1.0.3 and
>> other have apache-1.1.2.
>>
>> From what I understand of puppet, there is no way of associating a
>> specific version of a module to a specific node. The only way of doing that
>> would be to "embed" a version tag in the module/class name. However that is
>> ugly and does not work well with version control systems.
>>
>> Any suggestions of to accomplish this using puppet?
>>
>
>  Github's boxen project powered by librarian-puppet, or r10k:
> https://github.com/adrienthebo/r10k are good examples using Puppetfile
> for module version control.
>
>
> Thanks Nan. I looked at both and they address a different defined-problem
> than the one I'm trying to address. What librarian-puppet and the boxen and
> r10k solution you mentioned allow you to do is(per my understanding and
> experience with using librarian-puppet):
>
>    - To populate a modules sub-directory dynamically by using a
>    "Puppetfile" where you can pull different modules from different sources
>    and being able to specify which version to pull in. Once the modules
>    directory is populated, what is available to you to use in Puppet is still
>    a *single *version of that module.
>
> The defined-problem I'm trying to see if puppet addresses or create a new
> solution to address it:
>
>    - Having multiple instances of a module of different version number
>    available in the modules sub-directory where I can freely associate
>    different 2 different nodes to differing versions of the same module.
>
> They are typically used to populate the master. But I'm using per system
Puppetfile with 'puppet apply' instead. I suppose this won't meet your
requirements if you need multiple module versions on the master to compile
different versions per node.

Thanks,

Nan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to