On Wednesday, July 31, 2013 8:22:01 AM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote: > > > Hopefully my $0.02 can we worth something here ;) I'd argue that it's > really a separate resource type - since the ACL is related to the user > space. If you're going to extend it to multiple providers (solaris as per > your example) it's really similar in idea to RBAC. In fact, if you look at > Windows ACLs, RBAC, and set/get facl you pretty much have a new type. Or > at least that's what I'd hope :) >
And of course some Solaris is by no means the only Unix-y OS with ACL support. It is available on Linux, too, at least for the most frequently used filesystems, and I'm sure there are others. I'm inclined to agree that a type aimed at broad ACL / RBAC support would be a win. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
