Hi, Take a look at r10k. https://github.com/adrienthebo/r10k
Den > On 13 Nov 2013, at 4:02, dkoleary <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey; > > This may be more appropriate to the git group but, I suspect people here > would have run into similar situations more than the git users have. > > I'm working on a proof of concept for a git controlled puppet implementation > supporting an environment of linux systems including web and tomcat servers. > > Perfect world, what I'd like to do is provide the team that supports those > applications read and write access to the puppet modules that control their > applications only - so they can't see anything else. > > Right now, all the modules are maintained under one git repo. I took a quick > peek at the pro git book and it looks like subtrees *might* be the answer i'm > looking for; but, I wanted to ask people that have hopefully solved similar > problems if I'm on the right track before spending hours researching that > model. > > So: would git subtrees work? Is there a better method of handling this issue? > > Any hints/tips/suggestions greatly appreciated. > > Doug O'Leary > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/c649243b-42d1-4522-a31b-bad3529b78db%40googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/FB39ECC6-3D3C-479A-A0BB-AAE5B762723E%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
