On 09/03/2014 08:20 PM, jcbollinger wrote:
There are several viable solutions. I would favor putting your users and groups under management, and keeping (user, group) relationships in your external data. Then you could choose the correct group for any given user by, say, looking up the username in a hash. Strictly speaking, it is not mandatory in that case to put the users and groups under management, but doing so makes sense if you are relying on anything about them, including their existence. You then don't need to worry about how users and groups initially /are/, which is comparatively hard to know, but rather on how they /will be/, which would be easy to know.
There are system and ldap users as well, I cannot manage all of them by puppet. The users, their database is already there so I need to adapt the rest of the system.
t -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/5407839E.3050900%40martos.bme.hu. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
