Hi,

Sounds like a job for https://github.com/dalen/puppet-puppetdbquery 
potentially? pdbresourcequery or maybe even the hiera backend.


Regards,
Daniel


On Tuesday, September 9, 2014 11:49:21 PM UTC+1, [email protected] wrote:
>
> I have a difficult-to-manage application which does not implement a conf.d 
> or include syntax in its configuration, but requires a bunch of config 
> snippets that contain information only on groups of other servers.   I've 
> been dealing with this by generating the config snippets from templates on 
> some servers as exported resources, realizing them on the central server, 
> and then executing an external script to "compile" these snippets into the 
> final config.
>
> This has a couple of drawbacks.  First, it requires puppet to stat nearly 
> 15,000 little tiny config snippets every run that are not actually used 
> directly, and shouldn't need to exist.  Second, the final config file, 
> because it's compiled by an external script, isn't under the control of 
> puppet, so it has no idea if that file gets modified by something outside.. 
> so it can't know to update it. 
>
> I've been mulling over a better way to manage this config file, and I 
> think I've hit on an idea, but I have no idea if it will actually work, or 
> what the syntax would look like if it could.
>
> I'm thinking of replacing the @@file resources on the remote servers with 
> a defined type .. say .. @@data_container.   Then, on the server where the 
> data is needed I could use a collector to iterate over the exported 
> resources reading data from them to use in the single template for the 
> final config file.
>
> Where the data is defined:
> @@data_container { 'mydata':
>    someparameter => 'foo'
> }
>
> And then in the template on the other host, somehow get a collection of 
> those resources into an array, and make use of their parameters as 
> variables to be referenced in the template.. 
>
> <%- collection.each do |data| -%>
> <%= data.someparameter %>
> <%- end -%>
>
> Would this work at all?  Is there syntax to support something like this?
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/59ba639d-441a-41f9-bcf4-93ac45fe209f%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to