Thank you so much John, for taking time and explaining in detail. This
really helps new learner like me. :)

Thanks again.

Amogh

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:22 AM, jcbollinger <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
> On Thursday, October 30, 2014 12:46:07 PM UTC-5, amogh patel wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, John. It did help. I was wondering if we can somehow use an array
>> of these hashes so that we don't have to use require.
>>
>>
> There are no hashes in my example.  In particular, resource declarations
> are not hashes, and do not (generally) contain hashes.  The only hashes
> discussed in this thread so far are your $fs_hash and its contents.
>
> You can avoid using 'require' by using chaining arrows instead.  For
> example,
>
> base::fsdef { '/dev/sdb1': mountpoint => '/data/01' }
> -> base::fsdef { '/dev/sdc1': mountpoint => '/data/02' }
> -> base::fsdef { '/dev/sdd1': mountpoint => '/data/03' }
> -> base::fsdef { '/dev/sde1': mountpoint => '/data/04' }
> -> base::fsdef { '/dev/sdf1': mountpoint => '/data/05' }
> -> base::fsdef { '/dev/sdg1': mountpoint => '/data/06' }
> -> base::fsdef { '/dev/sdh1': mountpoint => '/data/07' }
> -> base::fsdef { '/dev/sdi1': mountpoint => '/data/08' }
> -> base::fsdef { '/dev/sdj1': mountpoint => '/data/09' }
> -> base::fsdef { '/dev/sdk1': mountpoint => '/data/10' }
>
> That is 100% equivalent to the alternative using the 'require'
> metaparameter.  You can even mix and match.  You can also add relationships
> after the fact by applying chaining arrows to resource references:
>
> file { '/tmp/after': ensure => 'file' }
> file { '/tmp/before': ensure => 'file' }
>
> # this may appear anywhere in the manifest set:
> File['/tmp/before'] -> File['/tmp/after']
>
> If your point in wanting to avoid 'require' is that you want an attempt to
> be made to perform each mount, even if previously-listed ones fail, then we
> come back around to my previous opening question: why?  Why does the order
> in which the mounts are applied matter?
>
> Anyway, the Puppet documentation contains a full description of factors
> affecting resource application order
> <https://docs.puppetlabs.com/learning/ordering.html>.  You should read
> and understand the whole thing.
>
> I note in advance that you will find among the docs reference to Puppet's
> 'ordering' configuration parameter.  You may like the sound of it, but you
> shouldn't.  If you have bona fide requirements for the order in which
> resources are applied, then you should declare those requirements
> explicitly in your manifests (as the docs also say).
>
>
> John
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Puppet Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/puppet-users/LAfBVAH-D1g/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/b8c3b792-1af2-4649-a98e-92fd7b65dd1b%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/b8c3b792-1af2-4649-a98e-92fd7b65dd1b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/CAJppLho54HHUJGaDvoPo5Wf7Ba6H_v9v%3D%2B7B0ye%2BOBiFOL3UKQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to