Er ah, to be more specific, I had to list the correct .pem files in the 
puppetmaster vhost, and change the server IP. 

On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 10:51:40 AM UTC-5, Roger Sherman wrote:
>
> Turns out this was the problem - thanks for the help, guys, as always, 
> talking it out helped point me down the right path.
>
> Thanks, 
>
> Rog
>
> On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 9:56:05 AM UTC-5, Roger Sherman wrote:
>>
>> Right - and on that note, I think I've made a little bit of progress, but 
>> I'm still not there yet.
>>
>> I looked at the apache vhost file for the puppetmaster, and found the 
>> following:
>>
>> # you probably want to tune these settings
>>
>> PassengerHighPerformance on
>>
>> PassengerMaxPoolSize 12
>>
>> PassengerPoolIdleTime 1000
>>
>> # PassengerMaxRequests 1000
>>
>> PassengerStatThrottleRate 120
>>
>> RackAutoDetect Off
>>
>> RailsAutoDetect Off
>>
>>
>> Listen 8140
>>
>> NameVirtualHost 10.60.0.100:8140
>>
>>
>> <VirtualHost 10.60.0.100:8140>
>>
>> #       LogLevel debug
>>
>>         ServerName puppet.nyc.viddler.com
>>
>>         SSLEngine on
>>
>>         SSLProtocol -ALL +SSLv3 +TLSv1
>>
>>         SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:-LOW:-SSLv2:-EXP
>>
>>
>>         SSLCertificateFile /var/lib/puppet/ssl/certs/puppet.domain.com.pem
>>
>>         SSLCertificateKeyFile 
>> /var/lib/puppet/ssl/private_keys/puppet.domain.com.pem
>>
>>         SSLCertificateChainFile /var/lib/puppet/ssl/ca/ca_crt.pem
>>
>>         SSLCACertificateFile /var/lib/puppet/ssl/ca/ca_crt.pem
>>
>>         # If Apache complains about invalid signatures on the CRL, you 
>> can try disabling
>>
>>         # CRL checking by commenting the next line, but this is not 
>> recommended.
>>
>>         SSLCARevocationFile /var/lib/puppet/ssl/ca/ca_crl.pem
>>
>>
>> So "domain" is our old domain, and 10.60 needs to be changed as well.
>>
>> I'll report back if this fixes the issue or not.
>>
>> On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 9:46:22 AM UTC-5, jcbollinger wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 7:57:44 AM UTC-6, Roger Sherman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> For some reason, (I think) the PM is unable to sign them. At least, 
>>>> that's what seems to be the case.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Well yes, sort of.  It appears that the PM is unable to sign the 
>>> requests because the client is unable to establish a secure connection over 
>>> which to *issue* the request in the first place.  (The client doesn't 
>>> need its own cert for that.  The client cert is for the client to prove its 
>>> identity to the master, which it doesn't need to do to request cert 
>>> signing.)
>>>
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/846ad9c1-bded-425f-9f4b-5fe74dd2c4f5%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to