> Le 21 juil. 2015 à 20:33, Peter Huene <[email protected]> a écrit :
> > Thus there would be no "eth0:1" in the interfaces list; it would just show up > as the first element in the secondary array. e.g. eth0:1 becomes > eth0.secondary.0, eth0:2 becomes eth0.secondary.1, etc. > > Thoughts on this approach? It would better model the output of command line > tools that don't distinguish interfaces between "iface" and "iface:x". > > Alternatively, we could keep eth0:1 in the list and have a reference to the > primary interface like you suggested. I'm open to either approach. I prefer to have no eth0:1 in the interfaces too, but it can break comptability with legacy code. I'm currently switching to facter 3, so that's not a problem for me, other might disagree. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/6F5D8E9E-DC38-402B-B254-85949A7DDC81%40orange.fr. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
