Gareth, I know this thread is old but do you have a way in the Rakefile to exclude the dependent modules? For example dependent modules that include different package resources based on OSfamily and version are something that module controls and tests I just need to make sure that the module is included in my catalog and any defined types used in my module get tested. (dependentmodule::resource['foo']) I've seen some other posts hacking rspec coverage.rb which probably isn't good (https://github.com/rodjek/rspec-puppet/issues/364). I've noticed the filtered?(resource) in rspec-puppet just documented of how to implement. Hopefully you can help here.
Thanks On Friday, February 7, 2014 at 5:54:06 AM UTC-5, garethr wrote: > > On 7 February 2014 02:51, gh <g...@garretthoneycutt.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > > On 1/26/14 7:50 AM, Gareth Rushgrove wrote: > >> For anyone else who likes writing tests for their puppet manifests, > >> I've just added basic code coverage to rspec-puppet: > >> > >> A blog post here about how to use it: > >> > >> > http://www.morethanseven.net/2014/01/25/code-coverage-for-puppet-modules/ > >> > >> I'd be interested in any feedback on how to improve or add to this. > >> > >> Cheers > >> > >> Gareth > >> > > > > Gareth, > > > > Great blog post. I tried this on a module with 100% coverage and notice > > that it reports back 50% coverage. After some poking around, found that > > it is checking code in spec/fixtures/, the stdlib module actually. There > > seems to be an open issue[1] regarding the inability to exclude things. > > Curious if you found a work around for testing your code and not the > > modules pulled in from .fixtures.yml. > > > > Currently the rspec-puppet coverage stuff does check coverage across > all resources, including those from dependent modules. For example > this module depends on the puppetlabs/apt module - > https://travis-ci.org/garethr/garethr-nginx/jobs/18133670#L113 > > I purposefully didn't add too much configuration to the first pass of > the code, but it would be simple to add some options to ignore > specific modules (I think). I thought I'd wait to see if anyone found > it useful first. > > Gareth > > > [1] - https://github.com/lemurheavy/coveralls-public/issues/184 > > > > BR, > > -g > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Puppet Users" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to puppet-users...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/52F44A2E.3070903%40garretthoneycutt.com. > > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > -- > Gareth Rushgrove > @garethr > > devopsweekly.com > morethanseven.net > garethrushgrove.com > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/2d63d692-f837-42da-a44e-c5b73dbfa015%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
