okay, I agree that it would be drastic and on the point that it would mean a
lot more work, which after it being done could prove not that important. I
just get annoyed by problems like this, and am, to some degree, still in
old-p:d diy mode :-)


> And AFAIK, editing a source package depedency list and bumping up a
> version is way less work and "clean" than rebuilding the package against
> new dependencies that also need to be built then, in the 1st case you
> just merge changes and go on working on your package and in the other
> case you fork, which leads to more work as you would hev to maintain
> quite a few things, until the day where you see that your fork relies on
> some new broken things, for which you would have to fork even deeper if
> you want to follow the non-merging strategy.
>

true. its easier. but then, we have periods where our packages are broken
due to some changes elsewhere and since we are a small team, it takes longer
to respond to such events.


>
> So for me, this would be a regression in regards of our goals to
> outsource as much as possible and focus on the end software and the
> live distro.
>

I agree, we set out this way, and when I make myself clear again that that
was our goal, I'm with you.


>
> if you're sure SVN is stable enough (remember people uses p:d for
> performances and installations and it would be a problem to switch to a
> JACK that might have random crashes) then I'm fine with the idea.
>

yes, I think so. pauls quick comment...

http://ardour.org/node/1920#comment-7506


> AFAIK, rob and you had a good experience teaching cinelerra on p:d, so I
> believe the cinelerra package is good? I used ardour from time to time
> and MM's is very fine, same for mplayer, avidemux.
>

thats true. They were working well. I just wish they'd release new ardour
faster.... :-)


> In the end I agree we might have to provide things differently, but I
> believe this is too early while there are still more important things to
> sort, or more "end" software that still need to be packaged :)
>

good. I can live with that, as it at least also keeps it somewhat open what
we decide to provide.
---
[email protected]
irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne

Reply via email to