http://guests.goto10.org/~krgn/files/
has a new kernel. test if you like, or wait until its in the repos ( still neeed to figure that one out :)) karsten On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Julian Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > K, > > > > will doJ > > > > J > > > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *krgn > *Sent:* 12 August 2008 11:58 > *To:* p:d > *Subject:* Re: [pure:dyne] new kernel > > > > Hey Julian, > > you need to install it as root with > > dpkg -i linux-image-blabla... > > then reboot into the new kernel. I recommend you to hold your breath (but > not too long!), and download/install/test a new kernel normally through our > repository which will be available soon. > > cheers, > > karsten > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Julian Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hey Karsten, > > > > Where do I need to put this file, is it a matter of placing the file in a > folder or is it an install? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Jb > > > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *krgn > *Sent:* 11 August 2008 10:31 > *To:* p:d > *Subject:* [pure:dyne] new kernel > > > > hey, > > new kernel here: > > http://guests.goto10.org/~krgn/files<http://guests.goto10.org/%7Ekrgn/files> > > choose " > linux-image-2.6.26puredyne-nonrt-puredyne-nonrt_2.6.26puredyne-nonrt-puredyne-nonrt-10.00.Custom_i386.deb<http://guests.goto10.org/%7Ekrgn/files/linux-image-2.6.26puredyne-nonrt-puredyne-nonrt_2.6.26puredyne-nonrt-puredyne-nonrt-10.00.Custom_i386.deb> > " > > this kernel does _not_ have complete preemption enabled. the reason is that > I wasn't able to find a combination of patchset and kernel sources that > wouldn't completely lock up my computer. I was wondering as to how a kernel > (with all debian patches though!) would perform when enabling some of the > core features, like the high resolutoin timer and 'voluntary preemption' and > so this is the result. i find it really ok for me personnaly, but of course > it might not be suitable for others. please test and give feedback, as to > wether this performs to your requirements and standards. just as a > benchmark: this kernel + hdsp running at 48kHz + 128 period size no xruns up > until about 80% CPU (core 2 duo t5500). enough for me... :-) > > this opens up the question whether hard-realtime is really needed... but I > won't answer that I guess. > > bbfn > > karsten > > > --- > [email protected] > irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne > > > > --- > [email protected] > irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne >
--- [email protected] irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne
