Am 30.09.25 um 4:21 PM schrieb Daniel Kral:
> The $online_node_usage is built on every call to manage(...) now, but
> can be reduced to only be built on any scheduler mode change (including
> initialization or error path to be complete).
> 
> This allows recompute_online_node_usage(...) to be reduced to
> adding/removing nodes whenever these become online or are not online
> anymore and handle the service usage updates whenever these change.
> Therefore, recompute_online_node_usage(...) must only be called once in
> manage(...) after $ns was properly updated.
> 
> Note that this makes the ha-manager not acknowledge any hotplug changes
> to the guest configs anymore as long as the HA resource state doesn't
> change.

I'm not comfortable with that to be honest, because it would not just be
a very badly timed large change that can lead to unexpected decisions,
but an accumulation of smaller changes without any bad timing.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kral <[email protected]>
> ---
> If we go for this patch, then we would need some mechanism to update the
> static usage for a single or all HA resources registered in
> $online_node_usage at once (or just rebuilt $online_node_usage at that
> point..).

You mean triggered from qemu-server/pve-container upon update? In
combination with that it would be acceptable I think. Question is, do we
want to spend even more time optimizing the static scheduler, or just
apply a v2 without patch 9/9 and rather focus on getting a PSI-based
scheduler going?


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Reply via email to