minor nit but otherwise LGTM
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 01:55:38PM +0200, Fabian Ebner wrote: > Otherwise, we might not run into an abort via bdrv_co_yield_to_drain() > (can at least happen when a disk with iothread is used): > > #0 0x00007fef4f5dece1 __GI_raise (libc.so.6 + 0x3bce1) > > #1 0x00007fef4f5c8537 __GI_abort (libc.so.6 + 0x25537) > > #2 0x00005641bce3c71f error_exit (qemu-system-x86_64 + 0x80371f) > > #3 0x00005641bce3d02b qemu_mutex_unlock_impl (qemu-system-x86_64 + > > 0x80402b) > > #4 0x00005641bcd51655 bdrv_co_yield_to_drain (qemu-system-x86_64 + > > 0x718655) > > #5 0x00005641bcd52de8 bdrv_do_drained_begin (qemu-system-x86_64 + 0x719de8) > > #6 0x00005641bcd47e07 blk_drain (qemu-system-x86_64 + 0x70ee07) > > #7 0x00005641bcd498cd blk_unref (qemu-system-x86_64 + 0x7108cd) > > #8 0x00005641bcd31e6f block_job_free (qemu-system-x86_64 + 0x6f8e6f) > > #9 0x00005641bcd32d65 job_unref (qemu-system-x86_64 + 0x6f9d65) > > #10 0x00005641bcd93b3d pvebackup_co_complete_stream (qemu-system-x86_64 + > > 0x75ab3d) > > #11 0x00005641bce4e353 coroutine_trampoline (qemu-system-x86_64 + 0x815353) > > Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.eb...@proxmox.com> > --- > ...ensure-jobs-in-di_list-are-referenced.patch | 18 ++++++++++++------ > ...id-segfault-issues-upon-backup-cancel.patch | 6 +++--- > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git > a/debian/patches/pve/0055-PVE-Backup-ensure-jobs-in-di_list-are-referenced.patch > > b/debian/patches/pve/0055-PVE-Backup-ensure-jobs-in-di_list-are-referenced.patch > index db86632..ebb7919 100644 > --- > a/debian/patches/pve/0055-PVE-Backup-ensure-jobs-in-di_list-are-referenced.patch > +++ > b/debian/patches/pve/0055-PVE-Backup-ensure-jobs-in-di_list-are-referenced.patch > @@ -17,26 +17,29 @@ freed. With unlucky timings it seems possible that: > Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.eb...@proxmox.com> > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumil...@proxmox.com> > --- > - pve-backup.c | 13 +++++++++++++ > - 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > + pve-backup.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > + 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/pve-backup.c b/pve-backup.c > -index 5bed6f4014..cd45e66a61 100644 > +index 5bed6f4014..7b094e5018 100644 > --- a/pve-backup.c > +++ b/pve-backup.c > -@@ -316,6 +316,11 @@ static void coroutine_fn > pvebackup_co_complete_stream(void *opaque) > +@@ -316,6 +316,14 @@ static void coroutine_fn > pvebackup_co_complete_stream(void *opaque) > } > } > > + if (di->job) { > ++ AioContext *ctx = di->job->job.aio_context; > ++ aio_context_acquire(ctx); > + job_unref(&di->job->job); > ++ aio_context_release(ctx); > + di->job = NULL; (I think it might be nicer to have this assignment before the release call) > + } > + > // remove self from job list > backup_state.di_list = g_list_remove(backup_state.di_list, di); > > -@@ -494,6 +499,9 @@ static void create_backup_jobs_bh(void *opaque) { > +@@ -494,6 +502,9 @@ static void create_backup_jobs_bh(void *opaque) { > aio_context_release(aio_context); > > di->job = job; > @@ -46,13 +49,16 @@ index 5bed6f4014..cd45e66a61 100644 > > if (!job || local_err) { > error_setg(errp, "backup_job_create failed: %s", > -@@ -528,6 +536,11 @@ static void create_backup_jobs_bh(void *opaque) { > +@@ -528,6 +539,14 @@ static void create_backup_jobs_bh(void *opaque) { > aio_context_release(ctx); > canceled = true; > } > + > + if (di->job) { > ++ AioContext *ctx = di->job->job.aio_context; > ++ aio_context_acquire(ctx); Since now both the above concelation and this unref acquire the aio context, we could just move the cancellation down into this `if(job)` as if (!canceled) { job_cancel_sync(...); canceled = true; } to be a bit more concise > + job_unref(&di->job->job); > ++ aio_context_release(ctx); > + di->job = NULL; ^ (and also assign before release) _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel