Am 09.05.23 um 14:55 schrieb Aaron Lauterer: > > * Don't scan all storages and only look at disk images that are > referenced in the config. With this, we should have removed most > situations where aliases would happen, and a migration is less likely to > fail, because a storage is not online.
I do prefer this approach as it also fixes issues like "unavailable, but enabled storage that's not even involved fails migration". And it's also more intuitive. But if we really do that, we need to be careful: In particular, we need to explicitly pick up volumes in the pending section (currently, that does only happen via the implicit scanning). There might be similar issues in other situations, but none that I'm aware of. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
