Am 20.03.24 um 10:49 schrieb Aaron Lauterer: > > > On 2024-03-20 10:30, Fiona Ebner wrote: >> Am 20.03.24 um 09:56 schrieb Aaron Lauterer: >>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer <a.laute...@proxmox.com> >>> --- >>> pve-system-requirements.adoc | 2 ++ >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/pve-system-requirements.adoc b/pve-system-requirements.adoc >>> index bc3689d..4db5358 100644 >>> --- a/pve-system-requirements.adoc >>> +++ b/pve-system-requirements.adoc >>> @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ Recommended System Requirements >>> (BBU) or non-RAID for ZFS and Ceph. Neither ZFS nor Ceph are >>> compatible with a >>> hardware RAID controller. >>> ** Shared and distributed storage is possible. >>> +** SSDs with Power-Loss-Protection (PLP) are recommended for good >>> performance. >>> + Using consumer SSDs is discouraged. >>> >> >> Having PLP might correlate with having good performance, but it's not >> the reason for good performance and good performance is not the reason >> you want PLP. It's just that both things are present in many enterprise >> SSDs, I'd mention that explicitly to avoid potential confusion. > > When it comes to sync writes, it is definitely one reason for the good > performance ;)
Oh, I see. Didn't think about that :) > But yeah, let's think about it, what about the following?: > > > Enterprise grade SSDs are recommended for good performance. Checking for > Power-Loss-Protection (PLP) is a good way to avoid consumer grade SSDs. > The use of consumer grade SSDs is discouraged. > > > Not too happy with that either, but phrasing it correctly and succinct > is an art in itself. > IMHO, it's still succinct enough. But you could also go for "avoid consumer grade SSDs, whose use is discouraged." >> >>> * Redundant (Multi-)Gbit NICs, with additional NICs depending on >>> the preferred >>> storage technology and cluster setup. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
