On 7/15/25 08:52, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
Am 15.07.25 um 05:55 schrieb nansen.su:
[snip]>> +
+sub type { + return 'opentelemetry'; +} + +sub properties { + return { + 'otel-protocol' => {I'm fine with the plugin specific otel prefix, but @Dominik: these here might be a good fit for the property separation? It's not many plugins and each of them has not that many properties. Or do you know anything that would speak against this? Anyhow, nothing that needs to block this for real and nothing you @Nansen Su need to worry about.
Yes, the property isolation should be working fine here, at least no blocker comes to mind. If we do that afterwards though, the property-names are still prefixed, so we'd have to reintroduce them without prefix + deprecate, etc. (or we just leave them prefixed) _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
