On 28/07/2025 15:30, Friedrich Weber wrote: [...] >> should hopefully not be too hard to fix, I'll try to whip up patches.. > > Thanks! I guess then (and if we want to add an untaint here at all) we > could keep this patch as it is, because qemu-img info does seem to > output an absolute "filename" even if the backing filename is absolute? > What do you think?
Sorry, didn't see the apply. Thanks! A patch for run_command to always pass untainted values could be done in addition, I guess. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel