Am 29.07.25 um 09:59 schrieb Stefan Hanreich: > On 7/29/25 9:28 AM, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: >> nit: might be better to avoid the "secret" terminology here? As this is not >> really >> a secret but rather something like a token, handle or maybe even cookie.
... >> Could be fixed up though, if you agree with changing this and have an opinion >> on what variant (handle, token, cookie, ...?) would be best. > > Makes sense, I'm gravitating towards token then - although handle would > be fine by me as well. Cookie has the same issues with pre-existing > sentiment / connotations imo? While lock handle is common term, those handles more often refer to file handles, so token might be indeed the least problematic / overloaded term here. > Gabriel mentioned something similar about the used characters, because > the current character set is also inconvenient for running CLI commands. > UUIDv7 sounds sensible for this use-case and since we already use the > UUID module in our stack we could just opt for that? ack. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
