On Mon Nov 3, 2025 at 11:19 AM CET, Daniel Kral wrote:
> The node affinity and positive resource affinity rule subsets are
> checked whether HA resources in a positive resource affinity rule are in
> more than one node affinity rule in total, and if so prunes them as
> those are not feasible [0].
nit: The link is missing
>
> This check has the assumption that each positive resource affinity
> rule's resource set is disjoint from each other, but this is only done
> in the later transformation stage when positive resource affinity with
> overlapping HA resources in them are merged to one rule.
>
> For example, the following inconsistent rules are not pruned:
>
> - positive resource affinity rule between vm:101 and vm:102
> - positive resource affinity rule between vm:102 and vm:103
> - node affinity rule for vm:101 on node1
> - node affinity rule for vm:103 on node3
>
> Therefore build the same disjoint positive resource affinity resource
> sets as the merge_connected_positive_resource_affinity_rules(...)
> subroutine, so that the inconsistency check has the necessary
> information in advance.
>
> Fixes: c48d9e66 ("rules: restrict inter-plugin resource references to simple
> cases")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kral <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
