>>Like uPNP on firewalls? Now I really gets scared! Hopefully, it's the switch which do the gvrp request ;) So the security is on the switch side and not proxmox.
It's just that currently, proxmox doesn't respond to gvrp request. Gvrp can be usefull if you have a big number of vlan to manage and a big number of switch, as it can configure your whole switch chain/trunk. But I'm always afraid of setting a wrong vlan in proxmox,like allow critical admin vlan to customers, so I don't use it ;) ----- Mail original ----- De: "Michael Rasmussen" <[email protected]> À: [email protected] Envoyé: Jeudi 7 Février 2013 18:34:56 Objet: Re: [pve-devel] new bridge code doesn't work with redhat kernel On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:45:49 +0100 (CET) Alexandre DERUMIER <[email protected]> wrote: > gvrp is a protocol to autoconfigure vlans on network switches. > (something like vtp in cisco world) > > I personnaly don't use it, because I'm scaried of security impacts. > Like uPNP on firewalls? Now I really gets scared! -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir <at> datanom <dot> net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir <at> miras <dot> org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- A beer delayed is a beer denied. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
