On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:13:00 +0000 Dietmar Maurer <diet...@proxmox.com> wrote:
> > Yes, but if we leave IP discovery to ND and SLAAC which is the intended way > > we > > will only need to provide DNS et al. Gateway, broadcast and IP will be > > handled by > > ND and SLAAC. > > Ok, sound reasonable. > And I forgot to mention: 50% of the code is generic and provided we only need to provide DNS et al the required code for this will only raise the lines of code by 10-15%. My intended way of doing it as IPv6 stateless DHCPv6. Read more here: http://blog.geoff.co.uk/2011/08/02/ipv6-automated-network-configuration/ When SLAAC with RDNSS is widely accepted this will be the way to go and this will be easy provided we use IPv6 stateless DHCPv6. Stateful DHCPv6 as we know from DHCPv4 is a bastard specification anyway since it is not able to provide default routers so SLAAC will be required anyway. -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir <at> datanom <dot> net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir <at> miras <dot> org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/games/fortune -es says: Marriage is the triumph of imagination over intelligence. Second marriage is the triumph of hope over experience.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
