On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:26:32 +0000 Daniel Hunsaker <danhunsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If RedHat isn't going to support the technologies we need, and OpenVZ is > evaporating anyway, maybe we should consider a different kernel? One where > KVM and LXC, at least, will be fully supported? It seems that creating our > own team to manage backporting kernel patches ourselves would be difficult > at best, and consume a lot of time in dev and test cycles, so finding a > different group already doing those things the way we need them done would > be preferred. > LXC development seems to be centered around Ubuntu kernels. -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir <at> datanom <dot> net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir <at> miras <dot> org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/games/fortune -es says: The good oxymoron, to define it by a self-illustration, must be a planned inadvertency. -Wilson Follett
pgpcFPvgxlA_J.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
