> Am 29.03.2015 um 20:07 schrieb Dietmar Maurer <diet...@proxmox.com>: > >> I guess that is not really the problem, but Docker is intended to run >> applications not full systems like the way it works for OpenVZ now. > > It is even more limited. The idea is to run single binaries inside a docker > container.
Agreed. I am no expert by any means, but from what I could see so far, docker seems more geared towards App deployment / management with sandboxing and lots of other bells and whistles. That is a different beast than virtualizing a complete operating system. > But in real world, most applications need to run many different binaries. I'd vote for LXC. It is by far a closer match to OpenVZ. Martin
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
