> Test case inspired by Linbit: > http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2008-May/009282.html > > We already know that the swap code has similar behavior. In case > a page gets touched while it is under write out IO, the swap allows > the modification to the page although it is under IO by the block > layer. Therefore the swap code does not know which version actually > got written to disk, but it does not care, since it knows that it > has the up to date version in core memory.
Oh, interesting - thanks for the link. So the only problem is that we get an inconsistent state due to live migration? _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
