I planned to try gfs2 on couple of my clusters. It will not work without
corosync at all, because it's needed for DLM.
21.09.2016 2:25, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
> Another question about my first idea (replace corosync),
> is is really difficult to replace corosync by something else ?
> Sheepdog storage for example, have support for corosync and zookeeper.
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "datanom.net" <m...@datanom.net>
> À: "pve-devel" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Envoyé: Mercredi 21 Septembre 2016 01:08:48
> Objet: Re: [pve-devel] question/idea : managing big proxmox cluster
> (100nodes), get rid of corosync ?
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:56:06 +0200 (CEST)
> Alexandre DERUMIER <aderum...@odiso.com> wrote:
>>>> vmid are unique with a single cluster, but not within several clusters...
>> yes, that's why I proposed to add some kind of optional prefix to vmid,
>> could be defined in each cluster.
> Instead of a literal prefix you could use a binary prefix instead. A
> binary prefix occupies fewer bytes in pmxcfs meaning fewer bytes to
> exchange between nodes and determine whether a VM is a citizen in this
> cluster or form a foreign cluster is just a matter of a binary and (&).
pve-devel mailing list