>>Exactly. Corosync is much better/faster and can replicate to more nodes. So I
>>would prefer to keep the
>>better technology (corosync), and improve it.
>>Maybe it is even possible to implement a satelite code directly inside
I agreed too. Better to improve the wheel than recreate it.
I have sent a mail to redhat developper which have make the satelitte RFC,
to see if they plan to maintain it and push it upstream.
----- Mail original -----
De: "dietmar" <diet...@proxmox.com>
À: "Alexandre Derumier" <aderum...@odiso.com>, "pve-devel"
Envoyé: Mercredi 21 Septembre 2016 10:00:35
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] question/idea : managing big proxmox cluster (100nodes),
get rid of corosync ?
> Note that for scaling, zookeeper,consul,... have some kind of master nodes
> the quorum, and client nodes. (same than corosync satelitte).
> I don't think it's technically possible to scale with full mesh masters nodes
> with lot of nodes.
Exactly. Corosync is much better/faster and can replicate to more nodes. So I
would prefer to keep the
better technology (corosync), and improve it.
Maybe it is even possible to implement a satelite code directly inside
But again, this does not solve all problems...
pve-devel mailing list