>>Exactly. Corosync is much better/faster and can replicate to more nodes. So I
>>would prefer to keep the
>>better technology (corosync), and improve it.
>>
>>Maybe it is even possible to implement a satelite code directly inside 
>>pmxcfs...

I agreed too. Better to improve the wheel than recreate it.

I have sent a mail to redhat developper which have make the satelitte RFC,
to see if they plan to maintain it and push it upstream.



----- Mail original -----
De: "dietmar" <diet...@proxmox.com>
À: "Alexandre Derumier" <aderum...@odiso.com>, "pve-devel" 
<pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>
Envoyé: Mercredi 21 Septembre 2016 10:00:35
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] question/idea : managing big proxmox cluster (100nodes), 
get rid of corosync ?

> Note that for scaling, zookeeper,consul,... have some kind of master nodes 
> for 
> the quorum, and client nodes. (same than corosync satelitte). 
> I don't think it's technically possible to scale with full mesh masters nodes 
> with lot of nodes. 

Exactly. Corosync is much better/faster and can replicate to more nodes. So I 
would prefer to keep the 
better technology (corosync), and improve it. 

Maybe it is even possible to implement a satelite code directly inside 
pmxcfs... 

But again, this does not solve all problems... 

_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Reply via email to