On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:11:00 +0200 (CEST) Dietmar Maurer <diet...@proxmox.com> wrote:
> > Is there a reasonable explanation for that? > > @mir: can you reproduce those results reliable? > First a comment on the numbers: The tests was made on a production setup so conditions could vary slightly. Having that in mind I would qualify scsi-generic and scsi-block to be more or less on par performance wise. Given the above and by using scsi-generic loosing the ability to have realtime numbers for disk IO dos not favor using scsi-generic. I will run another test now. -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir <at> datanom <dot> net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir <at> miras <dot> org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/games/fortune -es says: Formatted to fit your screen.
pgpJJEt_OLZhf.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
