> > The only drawback is that we can't mix local && shared storage in this case.
> > (but I think that if user have shared storage, he don't have need of local
> > storage migration)
> >>Not sure if this is a good restriction (Maybe this is a major use case).
> Note that you can have sourcevm (local + shared), destination vm : destination
> sourcevm (local + shared), destination vm : destination local + same shared
> (but with new volume)
I don't really understand that. I thought we will only migrate local disks. IMHO
it makes no
sense to migrate a shared disk to a local storage?
pve-devel mailing list