On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 09:26:50AM +0100, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > I think this would also be the first change to the Storage plugin API > > that would warrant bumping its version (in PVE/Storage.pm:37).. > > Why exactly? I think this change is fully backward compatible?
my initial reaction was probably overboard here - as long as Plugin.pm does not implement it external plugins can just fallback to the default and it should be caught by has_feature checks anyway. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
