| Hello Fabio
thank you for your will to compare open-source NAS sw I will defintely read (and learn from) your results. But I'm just wondering why is FreeNAs ISCSI so bad ? form my expirience iscsi was little faster than nfs ...
What kind of tests showed that NFS a way better than iscsi ?
thank you very much in advance and
srdačan pozdrav / best regardsTonči Stipičevićdirektor / manager |
d.o.o.
ltd. | podrška / upravljanje
IT sustavima za male i srednje tvrtke
Small & Medium Business
IT support / management | Badalićeva 27 / 10000 Zagreb / Hrvatska – Croatia
|
Send pve-user mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of pve-user digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Proxmox and NAS4Free (Michael Rasmussen)
2. Re: Proxmox and NAS4Free (Paul Gapes)
3. Re: Proxmox and NAS4Free (Michael Rasmussen)
4. Re: Proxmox and NAS4Free (Diego Barrera)
5. Re: Proxmox and NAS4Free (Diego Barrera)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:38:40 +0100
From: Michael Rasmussen <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox and NAS4Free
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:06:55 -0300
F?bio Rabelo <[email protected]> wrote:
Someone uses NAS4Free as storage for Proxmox ?!?
I have tried most of the NAS solutions out there, and then some more:-)
NAS4Free: Stable but the GUI is not so polished. NFS is fine but ISCSI
sucks. Based on FreeBSD 9.1. Developed by an OSS community.
FreeNAS: Stable and a nice GUI. NFS is fine but ISCSI sucks. Based on
FreeBSD 8.3. Backed by a company so payed support is available.
Openfiler: Project is abandoned.
Openmediavault: Very young and more or less a one mand project. Quit
stable but not a race horse. Based on Debian Stable.
FreeBSD: Same problem, and who wonders, as with FreeNAS and NAS4Free.
Developed by an OSS community.
OpenIndiana with napp-it: Same as with all the FreeBSD based systems,
horrible ISCSI performance on-top of ZFS.
But we seems to have a winner:
Ominios with napp-it: Blazingly fast ZFS and rock stable ISCSI as well.
I am in the middle of conducting a serious performance test which I
gladly will publish on this list/forum if somebody wants to read it?
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
Don't abandon hope: your Tom Mix decoder ring arrives tomorrow.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://pve.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/attachments/20130225/284fe0f9/attachment-0001.pgp>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:46:47 +0000
From: Paul Gapes <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox and NAS4Free
Message-ID:
<687d102bc5c435449b6ab16468762ddf08b41...@wfaexch02.corp.wellingtonfreeambulance.org.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Most definitely of interest thanks Michael.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Rasmussen
Sent: Tuesday, 26 February 2013 10:39 a.m.
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox and NAS4Free
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:06:55 -0300
F?bio Rabelo <[email protected]> wrote:
Someone uses NAS4Free as storage for Proxmox ?!?
I have tried most of the NAS solutions out there, and then some more:-)
NAS4Free: Stable but the GUI is not so polished. NFS is fine but ISCSI sucks. Based on FreeBSD 9.1. Developed by an OSS community.
FreeNAS: Stable and a nice GUI. NFS is fine but ISCSI sucks. Based on FreeBSD 8.3. Backed by a company so payed support is available.
Openfiler: Project is abandoned.
Openmediavault: Very young and more or less a one mand project. Quit stable but not a race horse. Based on Debian Stable.
FreeBSD: Same problem, and who wonders, as with FreeNAS and NAS4Free.
Developed by an OSS community.
OpenIndiana with napp-it: Same as with all the FreeBSD based systems, horrible ISCSI performance on-top of ZFS.
But we seems to have a winner:
Ominios with napp-it: Blazingly fast ZFS and rock stable ISCSI as well.
I am in the middle of conducting a serious performance test which I gladly will publish on this list/forum if somebody wants to read it?
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
Don't abandon hope: your Tom Mix decoder ring arrives tomorrow.
________________________________
WFA_Disclaimer
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.
No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Wellington Free Ambulance reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of any such entity.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:31:12 +0100
From: Michael Rasmussen <[email protected]>
To: "Matthew W. Ross" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox and NAS4Free
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:48:33 -0800
"Matthew W. Ross" <[email protected]> wrote:
Nice list.
I googled Omnios... no results. Is there a homepage for the project?
Certainly: http://omnios.omniti.com/
An also for those interested omnios is also backed by a commercial
entity for which payed support is available:
http://omniti.com/does/omnios
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
Anything worth doing is worth overdoing.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://pve.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/attachments/20130225/c8ca86d7/attachment-0001.pgp>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:12:12 +0100
From: Diego Barrera <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox and NAS4Free
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Il 25/02/2013 22:38, Michael Rasmussen ha scritto:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:06:55 -0300
F?bio Rabelo <[email protected]> wrote:
Someone uses NAS4Free as storage for Proxmox ?!?
I have tried most of the NAS solutions out there, and then some more:-)
NAS4Free: Stable but the GUI is not so polished. NFS is fine but ISCSI
sucks. Based on FreeBSD 9.1. Developed by an OSS community.
FreeNAS: Stable and a nice GUI. NFS is fine but ISCSI sucks. Based on
FreeBSD 8.3. Backed by a company so payed support is available.
Openfiler: Project is abandoned.
Openmediavault: Very young and more or less a one mand project. Quit
stable but not a race horse. Based on Debian Stable.
FreeBSD: Same problem, and who wonders, as with FreeNAS and NAS4Free.
Developed by an OSS community.
OpenIndiana with napp-it: Same as with all the FreeBSD based systems,
horrible ISCSI performance on-top of ZFS.
But we seems to have a winner:
Ominios with napp-it: Blazingly fast ZFS and rock stable ISCSI as well.
I am in the middle of conducting a serious performance test which I
gladly will publish on this list/forum if somebody wants to read it?
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pve.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/attachments/20130226/50db64e0/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:13:47 +0100
From: Diego Barrera <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox and NAS4Free
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Il 25/02/2013 22:38, Michael Rasmussen ha scritto:
I am in the middle of conducting a serious performance test which I
gladly will publish on this list/forum if somebody wants to read it?
I am very interested!
Please also shows the details of virtualization solutions on which you
performed the test.
diego
* Inglese - rilevata
* Inglese
* Italiano
* Inglese
* Italiano
<_javascript_:void(0);>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pve.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/attachments/20130226/7466f1f7/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
End of pve-user Digest, Vol 59, Issue 22
****************************************
|
