Dont use FreeBSD as storage server as the iSCSI implementation is quite bad. >From what I've read the best open source ZFS OS seems to be OmniOS which is >build on Illumos.
Napp-it is a nice web gui for vanilla configuration but and will work on sparc with some small tweaks. BR Ola -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] För Philippe Schwarz Skickat: den 10 maj 2013 15:45 Till: [email protected]; [email protected] Ämne: Re: [PVE-User] Does KVM(in proxmox) supports 'UltraSPARC T2 Plus' hardware virtualization extensions? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Le 09/05/2013 15:23, Patryk Benderz a écrit : > [cut] >> At least 50% but I would not be surprised to see a 75% slowdown. > That much!? In that case it is not worth to waste ones time even to > try to do it - not to mention lack of success guarantee. Is it mandatory to use those servers the way you wanted ? Ultrasparc servers are nice machines,...but not for everything ! Instead of building poor perf windows VM with top servers; maybe you could (don't know about your cost limits) use thoses servers another way and buy a couple of (less sexy, i agree) Intel/amd64 machines where you could install proxmox 3.1 servers in order to use HA. Your T2 could be turned into ...storage backend servers for your HA cluster ? For instance : ZFS which is a wonderful FS. Whether you choose FreeBSD or Solaris (the homeland of ZFS), you'll get a nice backend storage. My 2 cts. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlGM+cIACgkQlhqCFkbqHRbeUACdG1kQeBFUTY9Qf5zu6O+6+EQM Fu8AoKj/ynE3cyHagXy6DsIBTdmurIvm =4wEX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
