Look at glusterfs and sheepdog Sent from my iPhone 5
> On 05 Oct 2013, at 12:28 AM, Fábio Rabelo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Some time ago I give it a try, and it is not reliable, after several > Split-brain situations ... I gived-up ... > > > Fábio Rabelo > > 2013/10/4 Muhammad Yousuf Khan <[email protected]>: >> does anyone have use this DRBD 3 Node cluster with Proxmox cluster. >> >> http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/s-three-nodes.html >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> we are planning to host a SaaS for our few New customers. >>> DRBD worked well for us but for 2 nodes. but what if Site goes down.we we >>> need things up and running with out single transaction lost into our >>> database. >>> >>> we also have drbd option but unfortunately DRBD till 8.x only support 2 >>> nodes. >>> secondly drbd protocol A which is highly adviced for WAN, has some chances >>> loosing data. as it work on TCP threshold. >>> >>> as per my personal experience i thought first that we should use 2 node >>> cluster PVE. then ZFS snapshot should be transferd to Remote site. since >>> snapshots are not realtime replication, therefore data will be loss which we >>> do not want. any advice where i can run 2 server on site and 1 server off >>> site with no single transaction lost. >>> >>> >>> Note : we will be hosting a Microsoft platform. >>> >>> >>> any help would be highly appreciated. >>> >>> Thanks, >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pve-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
