On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:03:01 -0500 Martin Marenz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It is possible to use ZFS storage in such configuration, instead of a > shared lvm storage for the KVM guests. > And if it is possible, it is a good idea? have anybody experience with it? > Yep. Support for using ZFS is built-in. http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Storage:_ZFS I have a ZFS storage array running on commodity hardware (Stripped mirror on SATA2) which seems to give more than double the performance compared to a 3 node ceph cluster running on enterprise hardware. See attached screendump from crystalmark from a VM running Windows 7. CrystalDiskMark 3.0.2 x64 (C) 2007-2013 hiyohiyo Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- * MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s] Sequential Read : 92.061 MB/s Sequential Write : 83.432 MB/s Random Read 512KB : 91.106 MB/s Random Write 512KB : 80.351 MB/s Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 7.883 MB/s [ 1924.5 IOPS] Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 7.473 MB/s [ 1824.5 IOPS] Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 44.840 MB/s [ 10947.2 IOPS] Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 43.651 MB/s [ 10656.9 IOPS] Test : 100 MB [E: 1.0% (58.7/6141.0 MB)] (x5) Date : 2014/02/25 18:39:07 OS : Windows 7 Enterprise Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64) -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir <at> datanom <dot> net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir <at> miras <dot> org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/games/fortune -es says: Between grand theft and a legal fee, there only stands a law degree.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
