>>the use of a simple gre tunnel does not mean "it's crypted"
>>it's only encapsulated.
>>
>>My goal is to add ipsec_gre to the interface
>>or vxlan and gre as simple ipip tunnels
I think you can defined it using ovs_extra section in /etc/network/interface
iface gre1 inet static
address X.X.X.X
netmask 255.255.255.0
ovs_type OVSIntPort
ovs_bridge vmbr0
ovs_extra set interface gre1 type=gre options:remote_ip=X.X.X.X
or for vxlan
iface vxlan1 inet static
address X.X.X.X
netmask 255.255.255.0
ovs_type OVSIntPort
ovs_bridge vmbr0
ovs_extra set interface vxlan1 type=vxlan options:remote_ip=X.X.X.X
----- Mail original -----
De: "Diaolin" <[email protected]>
À: "pve-user pve.proxmox.com" <[email protected]>
Envoyé: Mardi 11 Mars 2014 09:52:37
Objet: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 3.2 released!
Il 2014-03-11 07:32 Dietmar Maurer ha scritto:
>> Dmz is separated And connected via tunnel And the three nodes could be
>> remote
>
> Sounds reasonable. I currently do not have free time to work on that,
> but I would accept a patch.
Just for clearing:
the use of a simple gre tunnel does not mean "it's crypted"
it's only encapsulated.
My goal is to add ipsec_gre to the interface
or vxlan and gre as simple ipip tunnels
In any case using it as isolated zones
Diaolin
---
S’à destacà l’ultima föia dal bósch nét
crodàda l’ei, solàgna, ‘n mèzz ai sàssi
e ‘ntant fis-ciava ‘n zìfol de oseleti
a tegnìr vìo ‘l pensér che vèn matìna
[Diaolin]
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
