No even with vxlan same disaster Sorry
Alexandre DERUMIER <[email protected]> ha scritto: >Hi Diaolin, > >maybe ovs vxlan tunnel could help ? maybe less overhead than a gre tunnel > > >----- Mail original ----- > >De: "Diaolin" <[email protected]> >À: "pve-user pve.proxmox.com" <[email protected]> >Envoyé: Mardi 22 Avril 2014 09:15:04 >Objet: [PVE-User] About GRE tunnels and the new OVS bridging > >As i said to Dietmar i tested it intensively for >adding a patch to adopt it in the PVE interface. > >Result: > >- very slow if the network is Gigabit (max 350Mbit) >- the transport has no encryption > >I think that the better solution is to use a VLAN and >use the entire bandwidth (if needed). > >I probed with openvpn crypted and uncrypted and i had >a better result (more than 50% of the net bandwidth) > >This happens due to the use of bridging because if i use >(as route) a real interface and not a vmbr the result >are very good (OVS or OpenVPN). > >And despite i didn't write the patch... > >Sorry but if you intend to use a transport create one with >openvpn (even in MESH mode) that works better and is encrypted > >Diaolin > > > > > >--- >S’à destacà l’ultima föia dal bósch nét >crodàda l’ei, solàgna, ‘n mèzz ai sàssi >e ‘ntant fis-ciava ‘n zìfol de oseleti >a tegnìr vìo ‘l pensér che vèn matìna >[Diaolin] >_______________________________________________ >pve-user mailing list >[email protected] >http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
