Assuming he is using shared storage (NAS)...

The nas operates as a 3rd node, and the systems are fenced via the NAS.

As long as 1 node can communicate with the NAS, it will have a higher quorum, than the node that cant connect to the NAS.

Single point of failure is NAS, so its not HA.

On 7/7/2014 11:50 AM, Yannis Milios wrote:

I tried the same config on a lab but does not work.
I think its not possible to have HA without proper fencing.
Im

On Jul 7, 2014 12:40 PM, "Angel Docampo" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    What do you mean by "it works"?
    Without fence mechanism, the cluster won't be aware there a node
    down, and then you can continue writing modifications in both
    sides and finish with a split brain.



    El 05/07/14 21:49, Gilberto Nunes escribió:
    WOW

    Even with just 2 nodes HA works fine!!!!

    I have tested some minutes ago...

    Is there something improvement on HA Code??

    I would like to know...

    Thanks


    2014-07-05 16:37 GMT-03:00 Gilberto Nunes
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:

        Hi

        Today I have deploy a tree node plus storage scenario in a lab.
        First at all, I image that I need configure fence device, as
        docs demand...
        So, I decide to use a MAnaged Switch (DLikn DES-3028).
        But, I realize that even without fence configuratio HA works
        properly and NICE, I might add..

        Here's the configuration:

        <?xml version="1.0"?>
        <cluster config_version="18" name="CLUSTER">
          <cman expected_votes="3"
        keyfile="/var/lib/pve-cluster/corosync.authkey"/>
           <quorumd allow_kill="0" interval="3" label="quorum"
        tko="10" votes="1">
           <heuristic interval="3" program="ping 10.90.90.100 -c1
        -w1" score="1" tko="4"/>
           <heuristic interval="3" program="ip addr | grep eth0 |
        grep -q UP" score="2" tko="3"/>
         </quorumd>
         <totem token="54000"/>
          <clusternodes>
            <clusternode name="pve01" nodeid="1" votes="1">
            </clusternode>
            <clusternode name="pve02" nodeid="2" votes="1">
            </clusternode>
            <clusternode name="pve03" nodeid="3" votes="1">
            </clusternode>
          </clusternodes>
          <rm>
           <failoverdomains>
             <failoverdomain name="serverfailover" ordered="1"
        restricted="0">
               <failoverdomainnode name="pve1" priority="1"/>
               <failoverdomainnode name="pve2" priority="2"/>
               <failoverdomainnode name="pve3" priority="3"/>
             </failoverdomain>
           </failoverdomains>
            <pvevm autostart="1" vmid="100"/>
          </rm>
        </cluster>


        I always though that I need fence device in order to make HA
        work...

        Thanks

-- Gilberto Ferreira




-- Gilberto Ferreira


    _______________________________________________
    pve-user mailing list
    [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

--

        
    *Angel Docampo
    *
    *Datalab Tecnologia, s.a.*
    Castillejos, 352 - 08025 Barcelona
    Tel. 93 476 69 14 - Ext: 706
    Mob. 670.299.381


    _______________________________________________
    pve-user mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user



_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Reply via email to