I already hit a number of bugs with gluster.. I think they should perform more tests before releasing new "stable" versions.
Your experience doesn't mean much to me as long as you don't give any details. I have done some benchmarks with iozone and glusterfs performances seemed quite honorable. Envoyé de mon iPad > Le 22 juil. 2014 à 21:24, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > From our experience with glusterfs, performance is terrible. Reliability was > also questionable as we experienced random corruption. > > I suggest you give ceph a try. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 22 Jul 2014, at 7:25 PM, Dhaussy Alexandre <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Le 22/07/2014 18:56, Michael Rasmussen a écrit : >>> On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:30:05 +0000 >>> Dhaussy Alexandre <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> But i have some annoying issues with live migrations.. >>>> Sometimes it will work, but sometimes (with no reason) it won't. >>>> When it fails (migration aborted), i try again then it works ! :( >>> Could it be a saturation of network or an overburden storage? >> >> I don't think so. >> Very few load on both network and storage. >> >> Network : dedicated vlan for glusterfs (for this 3 nodes only) >> Storage : 15 vms (doing nothing) / 24 vdisks / 18 disks on 3 nodes >> (glusterfs with replica 3) >> >> Glusterfs servers/clients and Proxmox on the same nodes. >> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> pve-user mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >> _______________________________________________ >> pve-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
