Thank you
2014-07-23 4:30 GMT-03:00 Franck Parisy <[email protected]>: > I had tested the 2 solutions for a long time before Proxmox include Ceph > package. Make choice has been very difficult. > > On my mind, Ceph is more efficient for Vms storage (best Iops, recovery > vhen osd falls) but difficult to adjust (many parameters). > > Gluster is really good for backups or files storage, Nfs is native, more > simple to deploy but this technology is older so they had many problems > with KVM/Qemu. > > Both technologies have been purchased by Red Hat so both are good ! ;-) > > If i can give my opinion : > > If you must migrate today : choose Ceph > > If you have time : Try the both > > A little "howto" without any ambition (it's just a working doc) > > > http://www.yakakliker.org/index.php?title=Informatique/Cat%C3%A9gorie_:_Virtualisation/Proxmox/Proxmox_VE_3.x/Ceph_%26_Proxmox_3.2 > > > > PS: > > I have choose Ceph with Proxmox and deployed it one year's ago without any > problems. > > Sorry for my bad English ;-) > > > Franck Parisy. > > ------------------------------ > *De: *"Gilberto Nunes" <[email protected]> > *À: *[email protected] > *Envoyé: *Mardi 22 Juillet 2014 22:27:55 > *Objet: *[PVE-User] Use GlusterFS or Ceph for proxmox vm's... > > Forgive me by the off topic, but I wonder if someone here can point me the > performance difference between GlusterFS and Ceph... > Which one is faster? Why? Some docs or websites?? > Thank you... > > -- > Gilberto Ferreira > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > > -- Gilberto Ferreira
_______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
