On 29 October 2014 19:45, Dietmar Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: >> One big advantage glusterfs has here is the intermediate filesystem. If >> things go >> totally pear shaped you can just pull one of the replica drives and copy the >> files >> off it. Difficult if not impossible to do that with ceph. > > One big dis-advantage of glusterfs is behavior after node failure. Seems > glusterfs > re-read and compare ALL data when the other node comes up again. This produces > much overhead and is very slow.
Heh, running into that right now :( Currently gluster is running checksums on 12 VM's (500GB data), pegging the CPU on all nodes. This after just rebooting one node. Ceph would perform better in this case? -- Lindsay _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
