> On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 02:27:28 PM Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > AFAIK that code is not stable. But I will try to compile and include it for > > testing. > > > Thanks, appreciated. > > I've done testing with ceph-fuse for VM hosting and it works, but performance > is pretty bad. It would be interesting to see if the kernel module is much > better. > > > Ultimately I'd like to see if it is a viable alternative to rbd direct. Our > testers run snapshots up and down a lot, and snapshot restore on rbd is just > to slow. But with CephFS I can use qcow2, which is much faster.
Uploaded to pvetest - please report test results back to this list. _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
