> I would like to add an option, to backup to a temp storage (local ssd for > example), then send the backup async (rsync for example), > to the destination storage. (big slow storage)
Aren't there solutions to this already? INotify based sync daemons (or even just a cronjob)? Although if this was implemented in PVE there could be a status message and a progress bar somewhere in the UI I suppose. Maybe there's an acceptable already-packaged solution which has a nice interface to get the status and/or start/pause the syncing. On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 07:56:11AM +0200, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: > About backup, > > I would like to add a new feature : > > As I m always afraid of problem which can occur with network backup through > nfs (network saturated, latencies,...), > > I would like to add an option, to backup to a temp storage (local ssd for > example), then send the backup async (rsync for example), > to the destination storage. (big slow storage) > > What do you think about it ? > > > > ----- Mail original ----- > De: "aderumier" <[email protected]> > À: "dietmar" <[email protected]> > Cc: "proxmoxve" <[email protected]>, "pve-devel" > <[email protected]> > Envoyé: Vendredi 10 Juillet 2015 07:41:35 > Objet: Re: [PVE-User] [pve-devel] backup : add pigz compressor > > >>We already have lzop, which is as fast as pgzip and uses less resources. > >>So what is the advantage of pgzip? > I think better compression than lzop (but slower), but still faster than > classic gzip. > > > >>IMHO a parallel lzop would be nice. > > yeah. don't have find any implementation currently. > > > ----- Mail original ----- > De: "dietmar" <[email protected]> > À: "aderumier" <[email protected]>, "pve-devel" <[email protected]> > Cc: "proxmoxve" <[email protected]>, "Chidester, Bryce" > <[email protected]> > Envoyé: Vendredi 10 Juillet 2015 07:05:07 > Objet: Re: [pve-devel] backup : add pigz compressor > > > user from pve-user mailing report than using pigz (multithread gzip), > > improve a lot speed of compression backup. > > > > Maybe could we use add it ? (or maybe replace gzip ?) > > We already have lzop, which is as fast as pgzip and uses less resources. > So what is the advantage of pgzip? IMHO a parallel lzop would be nice. > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
