Am 31.07.2015 um 11:33 schrieb Pongrácz István: > I like the openvz approach, where the whole system is inside a directory, so, > the CT uses directly the filesystem of the hardware node. In this case, there > are no overhead or filesystem corruption risk, due to that, the CT uses ZFS > "directly". Of course, on application level, for example mysql inconsistent > situation can happen on crash or snapshot (anyway, I did never experience > this).
Not the best source to get a good point: https://openvz.org/Ploop/Why#Before_ploop IOW: There was a great discussion a few days earlier on the ovz-list, if simfs should be droped or not - developers would like dropping it ;) Lico PS: Just a hint. Your posting has a good point ... PPS: .. even if I think you should better/more clearly compare your setup with latest pve, as some things are already in there. _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
