Soft-mounting NFS introduces the *possibility* of accidental (and silent) data
loss in corner cases, however. There's a lot of strident "soft-mounting is
dangerous!" rhetoric on the net, it is a reasonable option in many cases as
long as you understand the corner cases where data loss can occur silently and
either mitigate them or deliberately accept the risk in exchange for the
benefits of soft-mounting.
Personally, I use "soft,intr" in almost all cases, but that's because I'm
willing to accept the possibility of silent data loss if my NFS server goes
down moments before my PVE servers. (Note that silent data loss in a QCOW2
file could also mean the QCOW2 file becomes corrupt and unusable... the same
applies to VMDK, but should theoretically not be a problem with RAW.)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pve-user [mailto:pve-user-boun...@pve.proxmox.com] On
> Behalf Of Lindsay Mathieson
> Sent: September 16, 2016 17:08
> To: PVE User List <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Ceph and cold bootstrap...
> On 17/09/2016 12:54 AM, Brian :: wrote:
> > When NFS hangs you practically need to get hostage negotiators in to
> > talk to a machine into rebooting (or use -f:)
> If you soft mount NFS its a lot better.
> Lindsay Mathieson
> pve-user mailing list
pve-user mailing list